I find the leper also does well against enemies in the warrens. You'll probably do better with the leper if you're going up against any boss, with the exception of the necromancer. The leper, on the other hand, is a much better choice for massive single target damage. His heal and stun abilities also give him a great deal of versatility, but you're already getting great heal and stun options from the vestal in your party. Originally posted by luxtizer:It completely depends on what specific dungeon you're going to put the team into.Ĭrusader's extra damage against unholy makes him the better choice if you're going into the ruins. That dude seems underrated by many.īut you may take the Leper as well if you wish, he just does the same things in a bit different way. Im not saying the Leper sucks but i just wanted to praise the Crusader a little. Not to forget that the Crusader can either stun or heal your party quite effectively if needed, while Leper only cares about himself.Īll in all the Crusader brings alot more flexibilty to your team and since your vestal should be switching in Position 2 and 3 ( because of the Grave Robber ) the Crusader can help with the healing while tanking the damage of your vestal away until the backline is destroyed by PD and GR. The lack of ACC of the Leper can easily be buffed but the same trinkets could be given to the Crusader aswell, making him a really good Damage dealer aswell. When it comes to positioning the crusader is also way more flexible and can get himself out of the back or atleast keep stresshealing your team, while Leper is just doomed.
He can easily gain alot of PROT in one round and keep it up for the whole fight, while the Leper needs to reactivate his PROT ability and it is less effective anyway with that. I would definitely bring a crusader here.
0 kommentar(er)
